Legal Opinion
Morse Typewriter Co. v. Samanda Office Communications Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 11, 1986No. 84 Civ. 7524 (EW)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Morse Typewriter Co. (“Morse”) commenced this diversity action in October 1984 against three defendants: Samanda Office Communications Ltd. (“Samanda”), G. Richard Cook and Northern Telecom Ltd. (“NTL”). The action arises from Samanda’s sale to Morse beginning in May 1984 of Intelligent Remote Input Stand (“IRIS”) equipment designed to enable certain typewriters to provide word processing functions. In essence, Morse alleges that the IRIS units it purchased did not perform as they should have and it asserts causes of action for breach of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- McGowan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of New York v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Ronar, Inc. v. WallaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Porter v. LSB Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Business Trends Analysts v. Freedonia Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Cleopatra Kohlique, Inc. v. New High Glass, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.