Legal Opinion
Cleopatra Kohlique, Inc. v. New High Glass, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 29, 1987No. 86 CV 412PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLATT, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint and third-party complaint against Fital Di Richetta & C.S.A.S. pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(2) for lack of in personam jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
Background
Plaintiff Cleopatra Kohlique, Inc. (“Cleopatra”) manufactures and distributes cosmetic products. According to plaintiff’s amended complaint, in August 1984 Cleopatra ordered 1,000,000 mascara cases from defendant New High Glass, Inc. (“New High”) for use in the manufacture and sale of Cleopatra’s mascara product. Cleopatra intended…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Laumann Manufacturing Corp. v. Castings USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Cavalier Label Co., Inc. v. Polytam, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- GB Marketing USA Inc. v. Gerolsteiner Brunnen GmbH & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.