Legal Opinion

Kingsbury v. Arcadia Unified School District

California Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1954No. L. A. 23074PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Prom a judgment rendered by the court, sitting without a jury, awarding additional architect's fees for services rendered by plaintiff’s decedent, both parties appeal. Defendant attacks the judgment in its entirety, while plaintiff’s appeal is “based solely on that part of the judgment wherein” recovery of interest is denied. Por clarity, we shall hereinafter refer to the decedent as the architect. We have concluded that the judgment should be sustained in all its aspects.

The issue presented is the interpretation of two contracts under which the architect rendered services. Under the first…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Edwards v. BillowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Courteney v. Standard Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Engelberg v. SebastianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Erickson v. Stockton & Tuolumne Cty. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Salinas v. Souza & McCue Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Caplan v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Parker v. Maier Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. General Electric Co. v. Central Surety & InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Coronet Constr. Co., Inc. v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API