Legal Opinion

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 2014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge COLINS.

Verizon Pennsylvania Inc. (Employer) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the denial of its Modification Petition on the ground that the physician who performed the Impairment Rating Evaluation (IRE) on which the Modification Petition was based did not meet the requirement of Section *944306(a.2) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act)1 that physicians performing IREs must be “active in clinical practice for at least twenty hours per week.” We affirm.

Arthur Ketterer, Jr. (Claimant), a service…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Gardner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. In Re the Employees of Student Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Combine v. WCAB (National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Diehl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Svcs., Inc. v. Bureau of WC Fee Review Hearing Office (Piszel and Bucks County Pain Ctr.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Duffey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. D.M. v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Logue v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. WCAB (Logue)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API