Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lops v. Lops

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 7, 1998No. 97-9381Published

1DissentKravitch, Senior Circuit Judge

This case involves legal claims of significant human importance. In her petition brought under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 11.601-11610, Mrs. Lops alleges that Mr. Lops wrongfully abducted their daughters, and she requests that the two girls be returned to her custody.

This court, however, must determine whether the district court was the proper court to hear the merits of the case. ICARA vests concurrent jurisdiction in state and federal courts. See 42 U.S.C. § 11603(a). Initially, Mrs. Lops chose to file her ICARA petition in the Superior Court of…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API