Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 29, 1939No. [Nos. 33, 32, October Term, 1939.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.

The appellants were indicted separately, but were tried together, and were convicted and sentenced in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County for selling a lottery ticket and possessing lottery tickets in violation of statute. Code, art. 27, secs. 336, 342.

On February 10th, 1939, the liquor store of Howard Wright, appellant, in Annapolis, was searched by police officers for evidence of a lottery. The officers did not see any violation of law in the store; but, finding a locked box under the counter, they arrested Wright under a “warrant of investigation” and brought the box along to police…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Biscoe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  3. Nicholson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  4. McCleary v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. Watts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. Driver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Bass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  4. Courtney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. Hopkins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API