Legal Opinion

Oliveria v. Oliveria

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 27, 1940PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The first action is for personal injury to the plaintiff. The second action is for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate, Manuel Oliveria, who was the husband of the plaintiff. The defendant is the son of the plaintiff and of the deceased. In each action the only exception is to the entry of a verdict for the defendant in accordance with leave reserved, after the jury had returned a verdict for the plaintiff.

Both actions arise out of an accident which occurred in Swansea, apparently in the early morning of September 2, 1935, when an automobile which was driven by the defendant, and in which…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Roosen v. Peter Bent Brigham HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Bergeron v. ForestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Schneider v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  4. Keister's Administrator v. Keister's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  5. Rambo v. RamboSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Gaudette v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Kowalski v. GagneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Balts v. BaltsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Mone v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API