Legal Opinion

Roosen v. Peter Bent Brigham Hospital

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 26, 1920PublishedCited by 85 opinions

Tort, with a declaration in two counts, by the administrator of the estate of Jennie Roosen for causing her death, it being alleged in the first count that the death was caused by the acts, described in the opinion, of incompetent persons negligently employed by the defendant, and the second count containing allegations that the death was caused by “the combined negligence of certain persons in” the defendant’s “pharmacy department” and of the nurse attending the plaintiff’s…

Read the full summary

Tort, with a declaration in two counts, by the administrator of the estate of Jennie Roosen for causing her death, it being alleged in the first count that the death was caused by the acts, described in the opinion, of incompetent persons negligently employed by the defendant, and the second count containing allegations that the death was caused by “the combined negligence of certain persons in” the defendant’s “pharmacy department” and of the nurse attending the plaintiff’s intestate. Writ dated March 21, 1919; also an action of Tort or contract, with a declaration as amended in five counts,…

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

These are two actions, one to recover for the death and the other for the conscious suffering of Jennie Roosen, the plaintiff’s intestate, caused by injuries sustained by her while she was a patient in the hospital conducted by the defendant. The specific act alleged as that out of which the actions arise was careless and negligent treatment of the patient, while at the hospital for a surgical operation and the subsequent convalescence, in that corrosive sublimate, a deadly poison, was administered to her in place of Epsom salts, a harmless drug. Distinctive allegations of several counts…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. McDonald v. Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Wabash Railway Co. v. McDanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. O'CONNELL v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. President & Directors of Georgetown College v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Saint Luke's Hospital v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Vigeant v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Henderson v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1935

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API