Legal Opinion

Raun v. Reynolds

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

The above named defendants, appellants herein, assign for error in said cause—

1. That judgment is so rendered that interest is compounded on the judgment.

2. That the judgment is contingent and uncertain.

3. That the portion of the judgment which directs the manner of the sale of the mortgaged property, grants to said plaintiff greater relief than was by him demanded in his complaint, and was greater than the Court could grant in case of default.

And as to the first point. Independently of statutes, the only remedy by which interest can be recovered upon a judgment, is an action of debt upon the…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Terry.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mower v. KipNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  2. Guy v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Emeric v. TamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Watson v. FullerNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  5. Mount v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brooks v. ForingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. P. A. Lamping & Co. v. HyattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Ellis v. RademacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Burling v. GoodmanNevada Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Catron v. Lafayette CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API