Legal Opinion

McClung v. Colwell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from Chancery Court of Knox County. Joseph W. Sneed, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

Complainants, as creditors of B. S. Colwell, are seeking by this attachment bill to subject to the satisfaction of their claims 165 shares of stock in the Southern Car and Foundry Company, standing in the name of the defendant, B. S. Colwell. The attachment was levied on the stock while in the hands of defendant, W. P. Chamberlain, and notice of the attachment given to Colwell and the Southern Car Company. On May 14, 1901, J. D. Case intervened in said cause by petition, asserting title to said stock under a pledge made to him by defendant, Colwell. Case, it appears, had become the indorser…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Continental National Bank v. WeemsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. White & Williams v. PlattNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Kellogg v. TompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Arbuckle Bros. v. KirkpatrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris v. EggerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  2. Heymann v. Hamilton National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. McQuaide, Admx. v. McQuaideIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Bleakley v. . CandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Darragh v. ElliotteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API