Legal Opinion

Heymann v. Hamilton National Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

The complainant Heymann, who resided in New York, sent to one Silverman, a stockbroker in Chattanooga, ninety shares of Dixie Portland Cement Company stock. This stock was sent to Silverman upon representations of the latter that he had found a purchaser for same at a price satisfactory to complainant, and, upon further representation or promise by Silverman, that he would immediately remit proceeds of the sale to the complainant.

*24Instead of selling said stock sent to him as above, Sil-verman pledged thirty-nine shares of it to the Hamilton National Bank, along with some other stock, as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Parker v. Bethel Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Caulkins v. Gas-Light Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Elgin City Banking Co. v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Figuers v. SherrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Crawford v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  3. City of Nashville v. BrowningTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. White Stores, Inc. v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Williams v. MabryTennessee Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API