Legal Opinion
United States v. Morrow
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 5, 1925No. 98PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford
This case involves the construction of a proviso in the Army Appropriation Acts of 1915 and 1916, relating to an increase in the pay of clerks and messengers at headquarters of territorial departments. 38 Stat. 351, 355, c. 72; 38 Stat. 1062, 1067, c. 143.
This proviso follows a special appropriation made — in substantially identical language — in the two acts. In the Act of 1915 this provision reads:
“Pay to Clerks, Messengers, and Laborers at Headquarters of the Several Territorial Departments, Territorial Districts, Tactical Divisions and Brigades, Service Schools and Office of the Chief of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Minis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Abbott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Judge v. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Republic of Iraq v. BeatySupreme Court of the United States · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.