Legal Opinion

State v. May

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 11, 1999No. C9602-31431; CA A95620PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Before trial, defendant moved to suppress evidence obtained by a police officer in an inventory conducted pursuant to Portland City Code 14.10.040. After the trial court denied the motion, defendant agreed to a trial on stipulated facts and was convicted. We reverse.

While on routine patrol, Portland Police Officer Meyer saw defendant make an unsignaled turn. When Meyer pulled defendant over for the traffic infraction, defendant did not produce a driver’s license. Meyer took defendant into custody for that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. RidderbushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State v. AuerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BoatmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. TschantreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API