Legal Opinion

Racer v. Wingate

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1894No. 16,545Published

From the Blackford Circuit Court.

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

McCabe, J.

I can not agree with the conclusion reached by my brothers in this case. Charles A. Rhine, as commissioner of drainage for Blackford county, was charged with the construction of a certain ditch or drain, *123known as the Isaac Wingate et dl. ditch, established by the order of the circuit court of Blackford county, in March, 1885, under the drainage law of 1881, and the amendatory statute of 1883. Section 4273, R. S. 1881, et ■ seq.; Elliott’s Supp., sections 1175 to 1183. Said Rhine filed his report in said court, showing the completion of the work of constructing…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Graham v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Myers v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Muncey v. JoestIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Boardman v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API