Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1979No. 7924SC353PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion for a continuance. The defendant argues that the return of the indictment only seven days prior to trial did not leave him sufficient time to prepare his defense or to file a motion for discovery. Defendant argues that G.S. 7A-49.3(a) and G.S. 15A-630 were violated by the denial of his motion to continue.

G.S. 7A-49.3(a) provides in pertinent part: “At least one week before the beginning of any session of the superior court for the trial of criminal cases, the solicitor shall file with the clerk of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. WessonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. GinnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. HutchingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API