Legal Opinion

Hefty v. Comprehensive Care Corporation

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1988No. TC Nos. 16-85-05306, 16-85-07732 CA A44372 (Control), CA A44383 (Cases Consolidated) SC S35146PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

In this negligence action, we must decide whether plaintiffs may submit their allegations of defendant’s negligence to the trier of fact. Because the trial court granted defendant’s motions 1 for summary judgment, we review the record in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, mindful that defendant must show that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47C. Stanfield v. Laccoarce, 288 Or 659, 665, 607 P2d 177 (1980).

The record discloses the following:

Plaintiffs are Kimberly and her parents. Defendant operates an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Donaca v. Curry CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Piazza v. KellimOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Najjar v. Safeway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Sande v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Buchler v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Corrections DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Dodge v. Darritt Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API