Legal Opinion

Dodge v. Darritt Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 5, 1997No. 95-2021; CA A93209PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*614EDMONDS, J.

In this negligence action, the trial court ruled on summary judgment that, as a matter of law, plaintiffs injuries were not caused by a foreseeable risk of harm arising from defendant’s conduct or omissions.1 ORCP 47. Plaintiff appeals, and we reverse.

We consider the facts in the summary judgment record in the light most favorable to plaintiff. ORCP 47 C. During the spring of 1993, plaintiff was employed as a housekeeper for Columbia Memorial Hospital and was working within the scope of her employment when her injury occurred. Defendant was a contractor performing construction work…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Buchler v. Oregon Corrections Div.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Solberg v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Happy Palace, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Vandeveere-Pratt v. Portland Habilitation Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Graham v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Dodge v. Darritt Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API