Heilman v. Courtney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Concurrence
HUDSON, Justice (concurring).
I agree with the court's plain-language analysis and the conclusion that the conditional-release term imposed by Minn. Stat. § 169A.276, subd. 1(d) (2018), begins when a participant in the Challenge Incarceration Program begins living in the community. Based on this conclusion, I also agree that this case must be remanded to the court of appeals to address the remaining issues in this appeal.
I write separately, however, to explain my concern with section I of the court's opinion, which concludes that the court of appeals did not err when it sua sponte interpreted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Johnson v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.