Legal Opinion
Emery v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 22, 1951No. 12522PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
This matter is here on appeal from judgment on the pleadings entered by the District Court.
The essential facts, briefly, are: The United States brought an action against the owners of two apartment house units alleging violation of Section 205(a) of the Emergency Price Act of 1942 as amended, 50 U.S.CA.Appendix, § 925(a), and Sections 205 and 206 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, §§ 1895, 1896.
The complaint filed originally sought an injunction, treble damages and restitution of the rent overcharge. The violations of the various rent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Case v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Woods v. RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Woods v. GochnourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. EdwardsTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1982
- United States of America, Najeeb Rahman, Claimant-Appellant v. Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Price v. BlockDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1982
- Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. EdwardsTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.