Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Edwards
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
1DissentPointer, Judge
A. Disqualification.
I agree that there was no error in denying appellants’ motion for disqualification under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). I do not, however, find fault in the timing of the motion. Rather, I believe the motion — premised upon gratuitous speculation by opposing counsel as to possible bias of the judge, *724comments which the attorney later acknowledged to have been “totally baseless and unfair” — lacks a sufficiently colorable factual basis for any reasonable question to have been raised concerning the judge’s impartiality.
B. Limitations Period.
I also concur in the conclusion that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Occidental Life Insurance v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.