Legal Opinion · Dissent

Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Edwards

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1982No. Nos. 5-60, 5-61Published

1DissentPointer, Judge

A. Disqualification.

I agree that there was no error in denying appellants’ motion for disqualification under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). I do not, however, find fault in the timing of the motion. Rather, I believe the motion — premised upon gratuitous speculation by opposing counsel as to possible bias of the judge, *724comments which the attorney later acknowledged to have been “totally baseless and unfair” — lacks a sufficiently colorable factual basis for any reasonable question to have been raised concerning the judge’s impartiality.

B. Limitations Period.

I also concur in the conclusion that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Occidental Life Insurance v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API