Legal Opinion
Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Thelaw. Net Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 18, 2002No. Case C-3-01-116PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISQUALIFY DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL (DOC. # 36) 1
RICE, Chief Judge.
The Plaintiffs herein have set forth ten claims for relief against the Defendant in their Amended Complaint (Doc. # 17), to wit: trademark infringement under §§ 32(1) and 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1) and 1125(a) (First Claim for Relief); false advertising and unfair competition under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (Second Claim for Relief); trademark dilution under § 43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c) (Third Claim for Relief); trademark…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- International Electronics Corp. v. FlanzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- General Mill Supply Company, Manual Rotenberg and Milton Rotenberg, Plaintiffs v. Sca Services, Inc., Hale and DorrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ed Schmidt Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Lynne Gooden v. Chris BatzDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020