Legal Opinion
Ed Schmidt Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 11, 2008No. Case No. 3:04CV07621PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.
This is a contract case between an automobile dealer and a manufacturer in which the dealer, Ed Schmidt Pontiac-GMC *1033Truck, Inc., claims that the defendant Da-imlerChrysler breached a 1994 settlement agreement. Schmidt seeks leave to amend to add a claim for spoliation of evidence. [Doc. 122], Jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted.
Background
Schmidt is as a “dualed” dealership, in that it sells both General Motors vehicles and Jeeps produced by DaimlerChrysler. Schmidt obtained the Jeep franchise in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen W. Rose v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Paul Moore v. City of Paducah Mayor John Penrod Joe Viterisi, Harold Ford, Robert Coleman, and Joe Flynn, Commissioners Robert E. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Angela M. Phelps v. John D. McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Miles Tefft v. James Seward, A/K/A Jessie SewardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mark Silva, Jr. v. Donald J. Kreager, Jr., et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026