Legal Opinion

Jones v. Novo Nordisk A/S

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00550Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS (GLP-1 RAS) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 3094 TRANSFER ORDER Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in nine actions move under

28 U.S.C. § 1407

to centralize this litigation in the Western District of Louisiana. This litigation consists of eighteen actions pending in eleven districts, as listed on Schedule A. In addition, the parties have informed the Panel of 37 related actions pending in fifteen districts. ! The scope of this MDL, should the Panel order centralization, is a primary point…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Androgel Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  2. In re Invokana (CANAGLIFLOZIN) Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016
  3. In re Incretin Mimetics Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  4. In re Proton-Pump Inhibitor Products Liability Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API