Roche Diagnostics Corp. v. Selfcare Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS
McKINNEY, Chief Judge.
This cause is now before the Court on the defendant’s, Bayer Corporation (“Bayer”), motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of the plaintiffs, Roche Diagnostics Corporation (“Roche”), patent, U.S. Patent Reissue No. 36,268 (“'268 patent”). Bayer argues that summary judgment is appropriate because Roche has no data to support a finding that Bayer’s accused devices infringe the “substantially to completion” and the “buffer” limitations of the '268 patent claims.
In addition, Roche has moved for summary judgnent on Bayer’s defense of…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rowe International Corp. v. Ecast, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008