Legal Opinion
Rowe International Corp. v. Ecast, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 25, 2008No. 06 C 2703PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge.
Rowe International Corp. and Arachnid, Inc. have sued Ecast, Inc., Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corp., and View Interactive Entertainment Corp., claiming that they have infringed six patents owned by Arachnid and licensed to Rowe: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,355,302,5,781,889, 6,397,189, 6,381,575, 5,848,398, and 6,970,834 (the Arachnid patents). Rowe also asserts that defendants have infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,598,230. Ecast has counterclaimed against AMI Entertainment, Inc. for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,341,350. The case is before…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Baier v. Rohr-Mont Motors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd. v. Asetek Danmark A/SDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Emtel, Inc. v. Lipidlabs, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Krippelz v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- In Re Stand 'N Seal, Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.