Union Recovery Ltd. Partnership v. Horton
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Koontz
In this appeal we consider whether an assignee of a promissory note from the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) is entitled to the benefit of the statute of limitations available under federal law to RTC as receiver of the insured depository institution which originally held the note. Adhering to the common law rule that an assignee acquires the rights of the assignor, we hold that the federal statute controls the limitations period.
BACKGROUND
The facts of the case are not in dispute. On June 8, 1989, Thomas E. Horton executed a promissory note in favor of Federal Savings Bank of Virginia,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter v. Roy William Bledsoe, Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Tivoli Ventures, Inc. v. BumannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Mountain States Financial Resources Corp. v. AgrawalDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1991
- Central States Resources, Corp. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Federal Financial Company v. Michael T. Hall, Trustee Michael T. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Pollard & Bagby, Inc. v. Pierce Arrow, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- Twelfth RMA Partners, L.P. v. National Safe Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Global Financial Services, Inc. v. DuttenhefnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.