Legal Opinion

Pollard & Bagby, Inc. v. Pierce Arrow, L.L.C.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 5, 1999No. Record 990137PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

In this appeal, we determine whether the new owner of an apartment building is obligated by contract to pay commissions to the agent who procured tenants for the former owner, for as long as those tenants continue to reside in the leased premises.

The following facts are not in dispute. Pollard & Bagby, Inc. (Pollard) acted as the leasing agent for Willard R. Simmons, the former owner of an apartment building located on Stuart Avenue in Richmond (the property). As Simmons’s agent, Pollard procured tenants for the property. Simmons, Pollard, and each tenant procured by Pollard entered into a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Amos v. CoffeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. Chawla v. BurgerBusters, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  4. D.C. McClain, Inc. v. Arlington CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  5. Tuomala v. Regent UniversitySupreme Court of Virginia · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Alliance v. Com., Dept. of Environ. QualitySupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  2. Whitley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  3. Centex Construction v. ACSTAR InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  4. Video Zone, Inc. v. KF&F Properties, L.C.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  5. Campbell v. HarmonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API