Legal Opinion
ARRIS Group Inc. v. Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 20, 2017No. Case No. 16-md-02722-LPS-CJB; C.A. No. 16-259-LPS-CJB, C.A.; No. 16-260-LPS-CJB, C.A.; No. 16-277-LPS-CJBPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, United States District Judge:
ARRIS Group Inc. (“ARRIS”), Ubee Interactive, Inc. (“Ubee”), and Bright House Networks, LLC (“BHN”) (collectively, “DJ Plaintiffs”) filed suits against Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC (“MTel” or “Patentee”). DJ Plaintiffs seek declaratory judgments that neither they nor the purchasers of their products infringe MTel’s United States Patent Nos. 5,590,403; 5,915,210; and 5,659,891 (collectively, the “patents-in-suit” or “asserted patents”). (C.A. 16-259 D.I. 1; C.A. 16-260 D.I, .1; C.A., 16-277 D.I. 1) (the “Complaints”)
Before…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Candid Care co. v. SmileDirectClub, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Nexon America Inc. v. Uniloc 2017 LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. v. GRECIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Samsara Inc. v. Motive Technologies Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Samsara Inc. v. Motive Technologies Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024