Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Aaronson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1924No. 14083PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bv

PINKHAM. O.

This is an

appeal from a judgment rendered by the district court of Tulsa countv in an action instituted by L. E. Z. Aaronson, defendant in error, against the city of Tulsa, plaintiff in error.

The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff sought to vacate blocks 17 and 18 of Sunset Park addition to the city of Tulsa under the provisions of sections 4482 an<j 4483, Comp. Stat. 1921. To the petition of the plaintiff responses were filed by the city of Tulsa and several property owners in Sunset. Park addition.

The cause came on for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Siegenthaler v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Langston City v. GustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Thomas v. FarrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Oklahoma City v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Henry v. Ionic Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API