Legal Opinion
Crown Paint Co. v. Bankston
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 22, 1981No. 53060, 53428PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Vice Chief Justice:
I
In 1973, after many years of experience in the paint business, George Bankston opened his own paint supply company, Professional Paint Supply, as the sole proprietor. In that business, Mr. Bankston purchased paint from manufacturers, then resold it to his clients, who were the ultimate users of the paint and the paint-related products. In an effort to insure that he would have a continuous supply of paint for resale, Bankston entered into a contract with Crown Paint Company, a manufacturer/wholesaler and retailer of paint and related products. In entering into this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Krebsbach v. HenleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Oakridge Invsestments, Inc. v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Inergy Propane, LLC v. LundyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.