Legal Opinion
Appling v. Minarets & Western Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 18, 1929No. Docket No. 6666PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit.
The complaint states a cause of action for damage. At the opening of the trial the court directed the plaintiff to proceed with proof of his title to the claim sued upon. At the close of such evidence the court granted the motion for a nonsuit.
The evidence discloses that The A. Meister Sons Company was, on January 20, 1923, a corporation, engaged in the business of manufacturing rolling stock and equipment for railroads and also machinery of a general character. That on the day mentioned the said corporation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Del Campo v. CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Bovard v. DickensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- In re LevinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
- Ellis v. Feeney & Sheehan Building Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Shesler v. PattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Appling v. Sugar Pine Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Appling v. Sugar Pine Lumber CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929