Allstate Insurance v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINERMAN, P. J.
—We have before us two separate appeals which we have consolidated for decision. They present a single legal issue: Are cer tain office computer systems to be classified as realty or as personalty for purposes of property taxation? The distinction is crucial because in both cases the taxpayer is exempt from taxation of personal property.
In each of these cases the taxing authorities classified the property as fixtures to realty and assessed property tax accordingly. The taxpayers paid the taxes under protest and sought refunds via actions in the superior court. In 2d…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- M. P. Moller, Inc. v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988