Legal Opinion

Babac v. Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 1992No. 86, 87, 88 M.D. Appeal Docket 1991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

The question presented is one of first impression: whether participation of members of the Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board (the “Board”), appellant, by telephone conference call using a speaker telephone in a meeting open to the public convened for the purpose of deliberating agency business or taking official action violates Section 274 of the Sunshine Act, 65 P.S. § 271 et seq. 1 For the reasons that follow, we find that participation of members of the Board by telephone conference call using a speaker telephone in a meeting open to the public convened…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Frontini v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Babac v. Pennsylvania Milk Marketing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. O'Reilly v. Fox Chapel Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Upper Milford Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Sovich v. ShaughnessyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Trib Total Media, Inc. v. Highlands School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Baravordeh v. Borough Council of Prospect ParkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Smith v. Township of RichmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API