Legal Opinion

Smith v. Township of Richmond

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 2013PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

This Sunshine Act dispute concerns whether meetings between an agency and outside entities, including those involved in ongoing litigation with that agency, entailed “deliberations” — and thus, should have been open to the public — where the subject of the meetings was the same as that of the litigation, although the agency claims the meetings were held for information-gathering purposes only.

Appellee Richmond Township was engaged in litigation with the Lehigh Cement Company (“Lehigh Cement”), and the East Penn Valley Residents Group (the “Citizens Group”) as intervenor,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Arkansas Gazette Company v. PickensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Griffin & Dickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  5. Karoly v. MancusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MedinaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Bailets v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Alderwoods (Pennsylvania), Inc. v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. C.M. Dusman v. The Board of Directors of the Chambersburg Area SD and The Chambersburg Area SDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Alderwoods (Pennsylvania), Inc. v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API