Legal Opinion
Doe v. Carleson
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 13, 1973No. Civ. 71-864RFP, C-69-666RFPPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING SUPPLEMENTAL RELIEF
PECKHAM, District Judge.
These cases involve the right of the state welfare department to require cooperation of AFDC recipients in obtaining convictions of spouses for non-support. In Taylor v. Martin this Court convened a panel of three judges who found § 11477(b) Cal.Wel. & Inst.Code, in violation of the Social Security Act. The per curiam opinion, 330 F.Supp. 85 (N.D.Cal.1971) was summarily affirmed by the Supreme Court, sub nom. Carleson v. Taylor, 404 U.S. 980, 92 S.Ct. 446, 30 L.Ed.2d 364 (1971). The order in Taylor granted a preliminary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Diaz v. QuitorianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Taylor v. MartinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971
- Carleson v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Saddler v. WinsteadDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1971
- People v. WhelchelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doe v. StegallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- 20 Fair empl.prac.cas. 457, 20 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,136 Southern Methodist University Association of Women Law Students, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Wynne & Jaffe, Southern Methodist University Association of Women Law Students, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Thompson, Knight, Simmons & BullionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Doe v. RostkerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
- Doe v. DeschampsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1974
- Coe v. United States District Court for District of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.