Legal Opinion

Doe v. Rostker

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 10, 1981No. C 80-3151 SWPublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.

This action was brought pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a (the Privacy Act) in an attempt by plaintiffs to maintain anonymity throughout this lawsuit. This matter came on for hearing on January 7, 1981. Although this was heard at a status conference rather than on noticed motion, the parties filed briefs and fully argued the matter. After the hearing, the court took the matter under submission.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Doe, Roe and Woe are male citizens of the United States born during…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Bill W. Doe v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. National Commodity & Barter Ass'n, National Commodity Exchange v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. B v. FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Doe v. ShakurDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API