Coats Et Ux. v. Clanin Et Ux.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRoyse, P. J.
We are informed by appellants’ brief that appellees brought this action against appellants for the specific performance of a contract to convey real estate which was being purchased by appellees from appellants. It is stated the issues were formed by appellees’ complaint, appellants’ answer in two paragraphs, the first of admission and denial under the rules and the second alleging repudiation and breach of contract, and appellees’ reply to the second paragraph of answer.
Trial to the court resulted in judgment that appellees were entitled to specific performance of the contract, and damages…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Witte v. WITTEIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- HUGHES v. St. Bank of W. Terre HauteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
- Mendenhall, Extr. v. MendenhallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
- WATERS v. Perfect Circle CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- Bennett v. James H. Drew Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956
3Cited by9 opinions
- Loper v. STANDARD OIL COMPANYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Lilly Paint Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. v. Johnson, Admrx.Indiana Supreme Court · 1964
- Farm & Home Insurance v. KonradiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1964
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.