Legal Opinion

Worthy v. Gilbert

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1809PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

On the stipulation of the plaintiff’s attorney, to pay all the expenses of bringing the defendant’s witnesses to Albany, we deny the motion to change the venue. From the general terms of the affidavit, we cannot infer that the defendant has more than one witness, residing in Oneida county; but it does not appear that the plaintiff has any witness in Albany. If the party himself .will undertake to swear that he has a good defence on the merits, it is sufficient on a motion to change the venue.

Gold asked for costs, for ópposing the motion, as it had been deified; but the Court said, that on a…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Budd v. MalburnNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  2. Austin v. HinkleyNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Brittan v. PeabodyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1842
  4. Harrower v. BettsNew York Supreme Court · 1824

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API