Legal Opinion

Budd v. Malburn

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1823PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Sudam, moved to change the venue. After the cause was noticed for trial, the defendant obtained an order to stay proceedings with a view to this motion. The motion being re'flised 5

1Opinion of the Court

. TI. B. Davis, asked for the costs of preparing for trial, and of resisting this application.

*48The Court directed a rule, that the .defendant' pay' the costs of the. plaintiff, in preparing for trial, up to the time of the order to. stay proceedings, but refused to allow the costs* of resisting.

Rule accordingly, (a)

So that the rule laid down in Worthy v. Gilbert, (4 John. Rep. 492,) that on a motion to change the venue, no cost will be allowed on either side, does not extend to the costs of preparing for trial, but merely to the costs of the motion. I think I have heard it ruled-so-before in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worthy v. GilbertNew York Supreme Court · 1809

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The OrioleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1844
  2. Degroot v. BlakeNew York Supreme Court · 1824

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API