Legal Opinion

Austin v. Hinkley

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1856PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by defendant to change the place of trial from Washington to Clinton county.

1Opinion of the Court

Paige, Justice.

The defendant swears to twenty-seven witnesses, residing in, and adjacent to the county of Clinton ; and the plaintiffs tó twenty-eight witnesses residing in the county of Washington. Both parties, in their respective affidavits, allege that their respective witnesses are necessary and male-rial on the trial.

As the plaintiff’s witnesses outnumber those of the defendant, the motion to change the place of trial must be denied.

This ground being sufficient to justify the denial of the motion, it is not necessary to pass upon the objections to the form of the defendant’s affidavit.

Wh…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worthy v. GilbertNew York Supreme Court · 1809

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Latimer v. Union Pacific RailwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API