Legal Opinion

Candido v. Huitt

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1984No. Civ. 28304Published

1Opinion of the Court

151 Cal.App.3d 918 (1984)

199 Cal. Rptr. 41

NICHOLAS J. CANDIDO, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

JOHN RAYMOND HUITT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. 28304.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

February 9, 1984.

COUNSEL

Montag & Ochs, and John Thomas Montag for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Frank, Roseman, Freedus & Mann, Stanley Frank, John K. Ormond, Gibson & Kennerson, Paul R. Kennerson and Susan M. Goldbeck for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

WORK, J.

Nicholas J. Candido appeals an order granting a new trial on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence after a jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Jiminez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API