Legal Opinion
Mooney v. Preston Trucking Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 22, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 205-61PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, District Judge.
This action is brought by plaintiff against defendant pursuant to the provisions of 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b) to recover overtime compensation as provided by 29 U.S.C.A. § 207(a), together with an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, plus counsel fee and costs.
Defendant denies that the statutory provisions above cited are applicable, contending that plaintiff was an employee within the exempt statutory classification of 29 U.S.C.A. § 213(a) (1) as defined by administrative regulations set forth in 29 C.F.R. § 541.1, also appearing in Title 29 of the United States…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McComb v. New York & New Brunswick Auto Exp. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
- Richter v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Mitchell v. Branch Motor Express CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rodríguez Velázquez v. Concreto Mixto, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970
- López Vega v. Francisco Vega Otero, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1974
- Rock v. Sunbelt Cranes, Construction & Hauling, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- Rodríguez Velázquez v. Concreto Mixto, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970