Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Branch Motor Express Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1958No. Civ. A. 22012PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s prayer to enjoin the defendant from alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (hereinafter called the “Act”), 29 U.S.C.A. § 201ff., through employing certain employees for more than forty hours per week without paying them overtime pay as required by the Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 207).

The following requests of the parties for findings of fact, as modified below, are adopted as findings of fact of the trial judge and are supplemented by the findings stated herein:

A. These paragraphs of plaintiff’s Requests for Findings…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chambers Construction Company, a Corporation, and L. H. Chambers v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  2. Rothman v. Publicker Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  3. McComb v. Homeworkers' Handicraft CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  4. Tobin v. Anthony-Williams Mfg. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  5. McComb v. New York & New Brunswick Auto Exp. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Preston Trucking Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  2. Mooney v. Preston Trucking Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
  3. Goldberg v. Arkansas Best Freight System, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
  4. Goldberg v. Strickland Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1962
  5. Perine v. ABF Freight Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API