Rodríguez Velázquez v. Concreto Mixto, Inc.

per curiam :

The question whether or not an employee is an executive of an employer during the greatest part of the period covered by the complaint is again raised.

We conclude that the trial court did not err in concluding that appellant was an executive during most of the time, of said period and that therefore the claim for extra hours filed *570by appellant concerning that part of the period of his employment does not lie. It erred in concluding thus with respect to the period comprised between September 10, 1059 and December 7, 1960 when appellant received pay on an hourly basis. The case…