Legal Opinion

Gaffney v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1980No. 11311, 11319PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

Both appellants, having been found guilty of various crimes,2 seek reversal of their convictions on the grounds that they were denied a speedy trial, that the trial court failed to voir dire the jury concerning newspaper publicity and that the arrest and conviction records of government witnesses were not produced prior to trial. Both appellants also seek vacation of their sentences on the ground that the sentencing judge “was not sufficiently familiar with the facts of the case to be able to render an appropriate sentence.” Appellant Gaffney also requests reversal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Hammond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Tribble v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API