Legal Opinion
Johnson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 14, 1992No. 89-CF-818, 91-CO-218PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
On February 6, 1989, appellant was convicted by a jury of first degree burglary, D.C.Code § 22-1801(a) (1989 & 1991 Suppl.), assault with a dangerous weapon, iron, id. at § 22-502, malicious disfigurement while armed, id. at §§ 22-506, -3202, and rape while armed, id. at §§ 22-2801, -3202. After he filed a timely notice of appeal, appellant filed a motion for a new trial under D.C.Code § 23-110 (1989) claiming ineffective assistance of counsel and newly discovered evidence. Following a hearing, the trial court denied most of appellant’s collateral claims.1
*891Appellant now asserts the following…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bowman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Gethers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Chatmon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Baker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Burgess v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.