Legal Opinion

Seeley v. Erringer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 20, 1953No. 35,866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of respondent, Theodore C. Erringer, affirming an order of the probate court denying the petition of appellants, Bessie M. Seeley and Minnie T. Fitterling Sharpe, to admit to probate an alleged lost or destroyed will of decedent, Clara G. Fitterling Kinkead.

Appellants’ statement of propositions of law and fact in the district court made the following allegations of fact material to this

*29appeal:2 Respondent and Mildred T. Brringer were married in this state on December 30, 1943, and were divorced in this state by…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. State v. YoderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Dudley v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Estate of WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of KinkeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Laikola v. Engineered ConcreteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API