Legal Opinion
Markiewicz v. Toton
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 25, 1935PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
This is an action on an account annexed for money lent by the plaintiff to the defendant. The only questions argued relate to the defence of the statute of limitations. The writ is dated November 30, 1934.
The plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a housekeeper. On a number of different dates from November 8, *4351923, to November 2, 1933, she lent to the defendant varying sums. At various times the defendant paid, at the plaintiff’s request, premiums on the plaintiff’s insurance policy. The plaintiff, in her account annexed, has credited the defendant with these payments and also with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Howland v. StoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Kaufmann v. SydemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Minsk v. PitaroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Gillingham v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Haverhill Manor, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- City of Boston v. NielsenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Credit Service Corp. v. BarkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.