Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Myers

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1975No. 10857PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

This is an action to set aside a conveyance as in fraud of creditors, or in the alternative to assert a vendor’s lien against certain real property which was conveyed by plaintiff-appellants Dwayne and Beulah Blankenship to Roy C. Myers, Sr., and his son and daughter-in-law Robert and Nellie Myers, the defendant-respondents herein. A summary of the relevant facts of this rather convoluted transaction follows:

The plaintiff appellants Dwayne and Beulah Blankenship, husband and wife, originally were the owners of the property in question, a farm along the Kootenai River in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Community Counselling Service, Incorporated v. Robert Benedict ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  3. Young v. LiddingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Lipe v. Javelin Tire Company, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Showalter v. SpangleWashington Supreme Court · 1916

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jones v. WatsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Russ Ballard & Family Achievement Institute v. Lava Hot Springs Resort, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Stonecipher v. StonecipherIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Carpenter v. Granderson (In Re Granderson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  5. Fleet v. Rhode (In Re Fleet)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API