Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Slobiansky
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 13, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
This is a proceeding brought under the provisions of section 217 of the Surrogate’s Court Act to compel the payment of the claim of the petitioner as a creditor of the estate. The decedent, Sam Slobiansky, was a grand uncle of Barnet Martinsky, the petitioner. On November 2, 1932, the former opened an account in the Citizens’ Savings Bank in his name, “ in trust for Barnet Martinsky,” with an initial deposit of $5,000. It is undisputed that the decedent had withdrawn this amount from his individual account in the same bank. On January 5, 1933, the decedent withdrew the sum of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Matthews v. . Brooklyn Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Tibbitts v. ZinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Hanigan v. WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Hanigan v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of Schneider v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- Delaware Trust Co. v. FitzMauriceCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
- In re the Estate of BowenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Estate of Schneider v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1958